摘要：This issue of tweets will introduce the abstract of the intensive reading journal article "supply Chain Coordination Considering F

分享兴趣，传播快乐，

增长见闻，留下美好。

亲爱的您，这里是LearingYard学苑！

今天小编为您带来文章

“喆学（129）：精读期刊论文

《需求不确定性对绿色技术采用的消费者补贴的影响》

摘要。”

欢迎您的访问！

Share interest, spread happiness,

increase knowledge, and leave beautiful.

Dear, this is the LearingYard Academy!

Today, the editor brings the

"Zhexue (129): Intensive reading of journal articles

"Supply Chain Coordination Considering Fairness Concerns "

Abstract."

Welcome to visit!

本期推文将从思维导图、精读内容、知识补充三个方面介绍精读期刊论文《考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调》摘要。

This issue of tweets will introduce the abstract of the intensive reading journal article "supply Chain Coordination Considering Fairness Concerns " from three aspects: Mind map, intensive reading content, and knowledge supplement.

一、思维导图（Mind Maps）

二、精读内容（Intensive reading content）

(1)研究背景与问题(Research background and questions)

供应链契约的设计直接影响供应链整体绩效，而传统研究通常假设参与者完全理性（仅追求自身利益最大化）。本文引入行为运筹学视角，假设零售商具有“公平关切”（即关注利益分配的公平性），分析其对不同契约协调性的影响。

The design of supply chain contracts directly affects the overall performance of the supply chain, while traditional research usually assumes that participants are completely rational (only pursuing their own interests). This paper introduces the perspective of behavioral operations research, assumes that Retailers have "fairness concerns" (i.e., they are concerned about the fairness of profit distribution), and analyzes its impact on the coordination of different contracts.

(2)研究方法(Research Methods)

契约类型上，该研究聚焦三种常见契约——批发价契约、收益共享契约、回购契约。通过数学模型和算例验证，比较零售商存在公平关切时与完全理性假设下的供应链协调效果。

In terms of contract types, this study focuses on three common contracts: wholesale price contracts, revenue sharing contracts, and buyback contracts. Through mathematical models and case studies, the study compares the supply chain coordination effects when retailers have fairness concerns and under the assumption of complete rationality.

(3)结论(Conclusion)

尽管公平关切会影响零售商的决策（如订货量、定价等），但供应链的协调状态（即能否通过契约实现整体最优绩效）并未改变。无论采用哪种契约形式，只要契约参数设计合理，即使考虑公平关切，供应链仍可实现协调。

Although fairness concerns will affect retailers' decisions (such as order quantity, pricing, etc.), the coordination state of the supply chain (i.e., whether the overall optimal performance can be achieved through the contract) has not changed. Regardless of the form of contract, as long as the contract parameters are reasonably designed, the supply chain can still achieve coordination even if fairness concerns are taken into account.

三、知识补充（Knowledge supplement）

回购契约是供应链管理中用于协调供应商与零售商之间利益的一种契约机制，主要用于解决因需求不确定性导致的库存风险分配问题。供应商以批发价将产品出售给零售商，并承诺在销售周期结束后，以预先约定的回购价格（通常低于批发价）回收未售出的剩余库存。通过分担零售商的库存风险，激励其增加订货量，从而提升供应链整体效率。

A buyback contract is a contract mechanism used in supply chain management to coordinate the interests of suppliers and retailers. It is mainly used to solve the inventory risk allocation problem caused by demand uncertainty. Suppliers sell products to retailers at wholesale prices and promise to repurchase unsold excess inventory at a pre-agreed buyback price (usually lower than the wholesale price) after the sales cycle ends. By sharing the inventory risk of retailers, they are encouraged to increase their order quantity, thereby improving the overall efficiency of the supply chain.

1.参数设定：

1. Parameter setting:

批发价（w）：零售商采购单位产品的价格。

Wholesale price (w): the price at which retailers purchase a unit of product.

回购价（b）：供应商回购未售出产品的价格（b

Buyback price (b): the price at which suppliers buy back unsold products (b

2.决策过程：

2. Decision-making process:

零售商根据市场需求预测决定订购量。销售期结束后，供应商回购未售出产品，零售商仅承担部分库存成本。降低零售商的过剩库存风险，促使其更愿意订购接近市场需求的最优数量。通过调整w和b，供应商可间接控制零售商的决策，实现供应链整体利润最大化。

Retailers decide on the order quantity based on market demand forecasts. After the sales period, suppliers buy back unsold products, and retailers only bear part of the inventory cost. Reduce the risk of excess inventory for retailers, and encourage them to be more willing to order the optimal quantity close to market demand. By adjusting w and b, suppliers can indirectly control retailers' decisions and maximize the overall profit of the supply chain.

3.优点：

3. Advantages:

降低零售商库存压力，提高其订货积极性。灵活调整w和b，适应不同市场环境。

Reduce retailers' inventory pressure and increase their ordering enthusiasm. Flexibly adjust w and b to adapt to different market environments.

4.缺点：

4. Disadvantages:

供应商需承担剩余库存成本，可能影响其利润。需精确预测市场需求，否则回购成本可能失控。

Suppliers need to bear the remaining inventory costs, which may affect their profits. Accurate market demand forecasts are required, otherwise the buyback costs may be out of control.

今天的分享就到这里了。

如果您对文章有独特的想法，

欢迎给我们留言，让我们相约明天。

祝您今天过得开心快乐！

That's all for today's sharing.

If you have a unique idea about the article,

please leave us a message,

and let us meet tomorrow.

I wish you a nice day!

翻译：谷歌翻译

参考资料：谷歌、Chat GPT

参考文献：杜少甫, 杜婵, 梁樑, 刘天卓. 考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调 [J], 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(11): 41-48.

来源：LearningYard学苑