文学文享（114）：泛读文献

摘要：Today, the editor will interpret and share "Responsibility performance and shared value creation of core enterprises in agricultur

分享兴趣，传播快乐，增长见闻，留下美好。

亲爱的您，这里是LearningYard新学苑！

今天小编为大家带来文献泛读。

欢迎您的访问！

Share interest, spread happiness, increase Knowledge, and leave beautiful.

Dear, this is the LearingYard New Academy!

Today, the editor brings you the literature reading.

Welcome to visit!

1 内容摘要（Content summary）

今天小编将从“思维导图、精读内容、知识补充”三个板块，解读分享文献《农产品供应链核心企业履责与共享价值创造——基于扎根理论的案例研究》。

Today, the editor will interpret and share "Responsibility performance and shared value creation of core enterprises in agricultural product supply chain -- a case study based on grounded theory" from the three sections of "mind map, intensive reading content, and knowledge supplement".

2 思维导图（Mind mapping）

3 精读内容（Intensive reading content）

上周阅读了此篇文章的文献综述部分，对文章的相关概念有了一定的了解，如农产品供应链核心企业履责的影响因素、共享价值的概念及实现路径等，在了解了相关的概念及背景后，本期将继续阅读后续案例研究部分。

After reading the literature review of this article last week, I have a certain understanding of the relevant concepts of the article, such as the influencing factors of the performance of the core enterprises in the agricultural supply chain, the concept and realization path of shared value, etc. after understanding the relevant concepts and background, I will continue to read the follow-up case study in this issue.

作者在本文中使用的研究方法是基于扎根理论的探索性单案例研究，选用这个方法的理由主要有两个方面，一方面是本文探讨的问题适用于案例研究方法，另一方面是本文的问题属于过程性问题，没有很好的理论可以进行解释，适合进行单案例探索性深入研究。此外本文还采用了嵌入式研究设计，有利于归纳出可靠理论模型。

The research method used by the author in this paper is an exploratory single case study based on grounded theory. There are two main reasons for choosing this method. On the one hand, the problems discussed in this paper are applicable to the case study method, and on the other hand, the problems in this paper are process problems, and there is no good theory to explain, which is suitable for single case exploratory in-depth study. In addition, this paper also uses the embedded research design, which is conducive to the induction of a reliable theoretical model.

本文选取案例时遵循典型性原则，选取了较为成功的龙头企业作为案例，使本研究更有研究价值和重要的借鉴意义，同时该企业在履责与共享价值创造方面的做法及表现十分优秀，同步实现了经济效益与社会效益，还在脱贫攻坚领域做出了诸多贡献，值得研究学习。

This paper follows the typical principle when selecting cases, and selects a more successful leading enterprise as a case, which makes this study more research value and important reference significance. At the same time, the practice and performance of the enterprise in performing its responsibilities and sharing value creation are very excellent, which has achieved economic and social benefits simultaneously, and has made many contributions in the field of poverty alleviation, which is worth studying and studying.

在数据收集方面，作者严格遵循了数据收集的三角验证策略，多渠道获取信息，对访谈内容交叉对比、互相印证，提升了数据的完整性和科学性。作者长期对研究对象进行多轮半结构化访谈，获取了大量信息。

In terms of data collection, the author strictly followed the triangle verification strategy of data collection, obtained information from multiple channels, cross compared and confirmed the interview contents, and improved the integrity and scientificity of the data. The author has conducted several rounds of semi-structured interviews with the research object for a long time and obtained a large amount of information.

在数据分析方面，作者采用分组分析比较、反向求证编码、专家评估分析三种方法结合的方式保障数据分析的信度和效度，分三阶段进行数据分析，逐步形成了统一编码和理论框架。依据扎根理论，本文的数据分析主要有开放性编码、主轴性编码和选择性编码三个步骤。

In the aspect of data analysis, the author uses the combination of group analysis and comparison, reverse verification coding, and expert evaluation analysis to ensure the reliability and validity of data analysis. The data analysis is carried out in three stages, gradually forming a unified coding and theoretical framework. According to grounded theory, the data analysis of this paper mainly includes three steps: open coding, spindle coding and selective coding.

开放性编码的具体操作为基于原始分析资料对响应的独立事件赋予概念，然后将内涵或现象相关的概念进行合并归纳，形成具体的范畴。如案例公司有人员说积极参与脱贫攻坚是大势所趋，能引起社会关注，则可将其赋予响应国家政策的概念，然后将响应国家政策、发现商业机会、企业与供应链特征等赋予的内涵相近的概念归纳至一个相同的履责动因范畴内。

The specific operation of open coding is to give concepts to independent events based on original analysis data, and then merge and summarize concepts related to connotation or phenomenon to form specific categories. If someone from the case company said that actively participating in poverty alleviation is the general trend and can attract social attention, it can be given the concept of responding to national policies, and then the concepts with similar connotations such as responding to national policies, discovering business opportunities, and the characteristics of enterprises and supply chains can be summarized into the same category of responsibility performance motivation.

开放性编码的后一步是主轴性编码，是对开放性编码信息的再次分析和聚类，主观性较强，具体为寻找范畴间的关系，将不同范畴再次整合，归纳为一个主范畴内。如履责动因和要素支持可归纳在情景因素这个范畴中。

The next step of open coding is spindle coding, which is the re analysis and clustering of open coding information. It is highly subjective, specifically to find the relationship between categories, integrate different categories again, and summarize them into a main category. For example, the motivation and element support for performing responsibilities can be summarized in the category of situational factors.

最后一步为选择性编码，是在主范畴中分析逻辑关系和脉络条件，找出能够统领其他主范畴的核心范畴，形成以主范畴为基础的典型关系结构。如本文中主范畴供应链嵌入的目的是共享价值创造，供应链拓展的目的也是共享价值创造，最终得出的核心范畴就是共享价值创造。

The last step is selective coding, which is to analyze the logical relationship and context conditions in the main category, find out the core category that can command other main categories, and form a typical relationship structure based on the main category. For example, the main category of supply chain embedding in this paper is to share value creation, and the purpose of supply chain expansion is also to share value creation. The final core category is shared value creation.

4 知识补充（Knowledge supplement）

什么是三角验证法？

What is trigonometric validation?

在社会科学研究中，三角验证法被定义为使用多种方法或数据来源来研究同一现象，以增强研究结论的可信度。这种方法论策略的核心在于通过不同角度的交叉验证，弥补单一方法或数据来源的局限性，从而形成更全面、更可靠的研究结论。三角验证法包含四种主要类型：使用不同数据来源的数据三角验证、多位研究者参与分析的研究者三角验证、应用不同理论解释现象的理论三角验证和结合定性与定量方法的方法论三角验证。在案例研究中，最常用的是数据三角验证和方法论三角验证。

In social science research, triangular validation is defined as the use of multiple methods or data sources to study the same phenomenon, in order to enhance the credibility of research conclusions. The core of this methodology strategy is to make up for the limitations of a single method or data source through cross validation from different angles, so as to form a more comprehensive and reliable research conclusion. There are four main types of trigonometric validation: Data trigonometric validation using different data sources, researchers' trigonometric validation involving multiple researchers, theoretical trigonometric validation using different theories to explain phenomena, and methodological trigonometric validation combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In case studies, the most commonly used are data triangle verification and methodology triangle verification.

今天的分享就到这里了。

如果您对今天的文章有独特的想法，

欢迎给我们留言，

让我们相约明天，

祝您今天过得开心快乐！

That's all for today's sharing.

If you have a unique idea about the article,

please leave us a message,

and let us meet tomorrow.

I wish you a nice day!

参考资料：

翻译：DeepSeek