安玲学记（230）——精读硕士论文4.1评价体系的基本内容

摘要：In this issue, the tweet will introduce the 4.1 basic contents of the evaluation system of the master's paper "Research on evaluat

分享兴趣，传播快乐，

增长见闻，留下美好。

亲爱的您，这里是LearingYard学苑！

今天小编为大家带来“精读硕士论文《A公司数据平台项目软件开发服务供应商评价研究》的4.1评价体系的基本内容”。

欢迎您的访问！

Share interest, spread happiness,

increase knowledge, and leave beautiful.

Dear, this is the LearingYard Academy!

Today, the editor brings the "4.1 basic contents of the evaluation system of software projects of the master's paper 'Research on evaluation of software development service providers of A company's data platform proiect'".

Welcome to visit!

一、内容摘要（Content summary）

本期推文将从思维导图、精读内容、知识补充三个方面介绍精读硕士论文《A公司数据平台项目软件开发服务供应商评价研究》的4.1评价体系的基本内容。

In this issue, the tweet will introduce the 4.1 basic contents of the evaluation system of the master's paper "Research on evaluation of software development service providers of A company's data platform proiect" from three aspects: mind map, detailed reading content, and additional knowledge supplementation.

二、思维导图（Mind Mapping）

三、精读内容（Detailed Reading Content）

数据平台项目软件开发服务供应商评价体系的基本内容主要包括评价目标、评价主体、评价客体、评价内容、评价方法、评价实施的基本步骤。

The basic content of the evaluation system of software development service providers for data platform projects mainly includes evaluation objectives, evaluation subjects, evaluation objects, evaluation contents, evaluation methods, and basic steps of evaluation implementation.

首先是评价目标。软件开发服务对人员要求高，评价软件开发服务供应商前需了解软件开发项目特点，其特点包括需求不清晰、具有不确定性、属于智力密集型。基于软件开发项目特点和数据平台项目要求，本论文评价目标是对数据平台项目软件开发服务潜在供应商进行评价，选出最适合的供应商。

The first is the evaluation objective. Software development services have high requirements for personnel, and it is necessary to understand the characteristics of software development projects before evaluating software development service providers, which include unclear requirements, uncertainties, and intelligence-intensive. Based on the characteristics of the software development project and the requirements of the data platform project, the evaluation goal of this paper is to evaluate the potential suppliers of software development services for the data platform project and select the most suitable suppliers.

其次是评价主体。评价主体是指实施评价的具体人员。本文评价主要是由评标专家进行具体实施，评标专家由从采购人监管部门评标专家库随机抽取的相关专业专家5名，和2名采购人代表组成。

The second is the evaluation subject. The evaluation subject refers to the specific personnel who carry out the evaluation. The evaluation in this paper is mainly carried out by bid evaluation experts, who are composed of 5 relevant professional experts randomly selected from the bid evaluation expert database of the purchaser's supervision department and 2 representatives of the purchaser.

再次是评价客体。评价的客体是指评价的对象。本文评价的对象为所有报名参与A公司数据平台软件项目开发服务的供应商，包括已经注册成为A公司供应商和未注册成为A公司供应商的全部供应商。

The third is the object of evaluation. The object of evaluation refers to the object of evaluation. The object of evaluation in this paper is all the suppliers who have registered to participate in the development service of Company A's data platform software project, including all the suppliers who have registered as Company A's suppliers and those who have not registered as Company A's suppliers.

再次是评价内容。本文的评价内容主要涉及到资格证书、案例、人员实力、设计方案以及成本费用等。

The third is the evaluation content. The evaluation content of this paper mainly involves qualification certificate, case, personnel strength, design scheme and cost.

然后是评价方法。本文采用的是招标法对供应商实施评价，该方法融合了招标法和综合评分法。

Then there is the evaluation method. This paper uses the bidding method to evaluate suppliers, which combines the bidding method and the comprehensive scoring method.

最后是评价实施的主要步骤，主要分为以下七个步骤。

Finally, the main steps of evaluation implementation are divided into the following seven steps.

四、知识补充——层次分析法的优缺点（Knowledge Supplement -- Advantages and disadvantages of Analytic hierarchy process）

人们在对社会、经济以及管理领域的问题进行系统分析时，面临的经常是一个由相互关联、相互制约的众多因素构成的复杂系统。层次分析法则为研究这类复杂的系统，提供了一种新的、简洁的、实用的决策方法。

When people systematically analyze the problems in the social, economic and management fields, they are often faced with a complex system composed of many interrelated and mutually restrictive factors. Hierarchical analysis provides a new, simple and practical decision-making method for studying such complex systems.