摘要：对于同意发表，我们要求需要需要签署“参与者同意在NRR出版物上发布图像和/或有关图像的信息”的文件。除非参与研究的知情同意书已涵盖受试者对于出版的许可，并评估了受试者的同意能力（如他们目前的行为或沟通是否表明他们已理解发表或同意过程的利与弊？他们的能力不足可能
#1
专家意见： Please note that CONSENT to participate in clinical trials is different from consent to publication. Please check if appropriate informed consent has been obtained.
译文：请作者注意同意参与临床试验与同意发表是不一样的。请检查是否获得合适的知情同意。
修改意见：我们经常发现作者将同意发表与同意参与研究混为一谈。一些参与研究的知情同意书确实涵盖了预期的发表，但可能仍不完善。
对于同意发表，我们要求需要需要签署“参与者同意在NRR出版物上发布图像和/或有关图像的信息”的文件。除非参与研究的知情同意书已涵盖受试者对于出版的许可，并评估了受试者的同意能力（如他们目前的行为或沟通是否表明他们已理解发表或同意过程的利与弊？他们的能力不足可能会持续多久？如果他们有望恢复，任何决定都应该等到那时决定。他们能否代表自己同意？是否已采取一切合理措施帮助受试者代表自己做出决定？）
以下为NRR参与者同意在NRR出版物上发布图像和/或有关图像的信息的范例：
Consent form
For a participant’s consent to publication of images and/or information about them in NRR publications.
CONSENT
I[PRINT FULL NAME] give my consent for the Material about me/the participant to appear in a NRR publication.
I confirm that I: (please tick boxes to confirm)
have seen the photo, image, text or other material about me/the participanthave read the article to be submitted to NRRam legally entitled to give this consent.I understand the following:
The Material will be published without my/the participant’s name attached, however I understand that complete anonymity cannot be guaranteed. It is possible that somebody somewhere - for example, somebody who looked after me/the participant or a relative - may recognize me/the participant.The Material may show or include details of my/the participant’s medical condition or injury and any prognosis, treatment or surgery that I have/the participant has, had or may have in the future.The article may be published in a journal which is distributed worldwide. NRR’s publications go mainly to doctors and other healthcare professionals but are also seen by many others including academics, students and journalists.The article, including the Material, may be the subject of a press release, and may be linked to from social media and/or used in other promotional activities. Once published, the article will be placed on a NRR website and may also be available on other websites.The text of the article will be edited for style, grammar and consistency before publication.I/the participant will not receive any financial benefit from publication of the article.The article may also be used in full or in part in other publications and products published by NRR and/or by other publishers. This includes publication in English and in translation, in print, in digital formats, and in any other formats that may be used by NRR or other publishers now and in the future. The article may appear in local editions of journals or other publications, published in the UK and overseas.I can revoke my consent at any time before publication, but once the article has been committed to publication (“gone to press”) it will not be possible to revoke the consent.This consent form will be retained securely and in confidence by NRR in accordance with the law, for no longer than necessary. Personal data provided in this form will be used and retained in accordance with NRR’s Privacy Policy.Please tick box to confirm the following:
If signing on behalf of the participant, please give the reason why the participant can’t consent for themselves (e.g. participant is under 18 or has cognitive or intellectual impairment).
Date:
If you are signing for a family or other group, please tick the box to confirm that all relevant members of the family or group have been informed.Details of person who has explained and administered the form to the participant or their representative (e.g. the corresponding author or other person who has the authority to obtain consent).
#2
专家意见：Revising the text in the Results (and possible the Introduction) to clarify why the plus maze test and open field test were performed. It seems that the first two subsections of the Results describe confirmatory results (e.g., confirming that the model was correctly established); if this is the case, it seems important to state this explicitly, and perhaps condense or move these subsections so that the Results is primarily devoted to the novel results.
译文：修改结果（可能还有引言），说明为什么要进行正迷宫测试和旷场测试。结果的2两小节似乎已描述了验证性结果（如确认模型已正确建立）。如果是这样的话，明确说明这一点似乎很重要，也许可压缩或移动这些内容，以便主要展示新颖的结果。
修改意见：每项测试的选择都应基于特定的研究目标和假设。通过明确描述每项测试的理由，读者能够理解为什么选择这些特定的实验方法。如迷宫测试是作为评估焦虑的方法。通过解释测试的目的，读者可以更好地把握研究的整体架构和逻辑关系。这种清晰的逻辑链条使得研究的每一步都显得有理有据。对于复杂的实验设计和结果，通过清晰的理由描述，可以有效降低读者的认知负担，使他们更容易理解研究的核心内容，提高研究的整体可读性和理解度。
来源：中国神经再生研究杂志
