文学文享（108）：泛读文献

摘要：Today, the editor will interpret and share "Identification of key stakeholders in forestry enterprises based on Mitchell three cla

分享兴趣，传播快乐，增长见闻，留下美好。

亲爱的您，这里是LearningYard新学苑！

今天小编为大家带来文献泛读。

欢迎您的访问！

Share interest, spread happiness, increase Knowledge, and leave beautiful.

Dear, this is the LearingYard New Academy!

Today, the editor brings you the literature reading.

Welcome to visit!

1 内容摘要（Content summary）

今天小编将从“思维导图、精读内容、知识补充”三个板块，解读分享文献《基于Mitchell三分类评分法的林业企业关键利益相关者识别研究》。

Today, the editor will interpret and share "Identification of key stakeholders in forestry enterprises based on Mitchell three classification scoring method" from the three sections of "mind map, intensive reading content, and knowledge supplement".

2 思维导图（Mind mapping）

3 精读内容（Intensive reading content）

本期泛读的文献是刊载于生态经济期刊上的一篇优秀文献，题为基于Mitchell三分类评分法的林业企业关键利益相关者识别研究。文章作者认识到清晰地识别企业的关键利益相关者是制定正确的企业社会责任战略，赢得竞争优势的前提，故采取米切尔评分法对林业企业的利益相关者进行识别比较，最终得出了相关结论。

The extensive reading literature in this issue is an excellent literature published in the Journal of ecological economy, entitled research on the identification of key stakeholders of forestry enterprises based on Mitchell three classification scoring method. The author realized that clearly identifying the key stakeholders of the enterprise was the premise of formulating the correct corporate social responsibility strategy and winning the competitive advantage, so the Mitchell score method was used to identify and compare the stakeholders of forestry enterprises, and finally came to the relevant conclusion.

本文的主要研究对象是林业企业，林业企业特别是有营林业务的林业企业，较其他行业通常具有更长的价值链，更长的投资回收期和更大的初期投资，这些特征导致林业企业在与其利益相关者相互作用时承受更大的经营风险，同时这些企业的林地地块与其他利益相关者的地块长期相邻，相互作用，故很好地识别利益相关者就显得更加重要。

The main research object of this paper is forestry enterprises. Compared with other industries, forestry enterprises, especially those with forestry business, usually have a longer value chain, a longer payback period and a larger initial investment. These characteristics lead to forestry enterprises bearing greater operational risks when interacting with their stakeholders. At the same time, the woodland plots of these enterprises are adjacent to the plots of other stakeholders for a long time, so it is more important to identify stakeholders well.

本文初步确定林业企业可能的利益相关者使用的方法为文献分析和企业预调研，同时还从企业所提供的年度社会责任报告中找到了一些企业利益相关者的列表。相较于前两篇文章，本文对这个过程的描述更为细致，通过四个案例企业反馈的结果，作者得到了12类林业企业的利益相关者，其中包括既有文献中提及的利益相关者，也有营林企业实践中提及的利益相关者。

In this paper, the methods used to preliminarily determine the possible stakeholders of forestry enterprises are literature analysis and enterprise pre research. At the same time, some lists of enterprise stakeholders are found from the annual social responsibility report provided by enterprises. Compared with the previous two articles, the description of this process is more detailed in this paper. Through the feedback results of four case enterprises, the author obtained 12 types of stakeholders of forestry enterprises, including stakeholders mentioned in both the literature and the practice of forestry enterprises.

除了上两期文章中都有使用到的米切尔评分法，本文还采用了质性分析的方法对利益相关者进行更加全面的识别。作者认为使用米切尔评分法获取数据是定量分析，只能得到不同利益相关者的属性值排序，无法获悉产生利益相关者属性不同的原因，以及利益相关者与企业间存在的利益冲突，故作者通过定量定性相结合的方法更加全面地识别和分析了利益相关者。

In addition to the Mitchell scoring method used in the last two articles, this paper also uses the method of qualitative analysis to identify stakeholders more comprehensively. The author believes that the use of Mitchell scoring method to obtain data is quantitative analysis, which can only get the attribute value ranking of different stakeholders, and cannot know the reasons for the different attributes of stakeholders and the interest conflicts between stakeholders and enterprises. Therefore, the author identifies and analyzes stakeholders more comprehensively by combining quantitative and qualitative methods.

在使用两种分析方法都得到了利益相关者的识别结果后，作者对这两种方法进行了结果上的比较，作者认为不同点在于米切尔评分法给出了不同利益相关者的排序，但不知道排序背后的原因是什么，而质性分析恰好给出了原因，二者互相补充可以得出更为全面的结论。作者也在后续的分析当中将非政府组织这一被米切尔评分法排除的利益相关者重新纳入到了关键利益相关者当中。

After using the two analysis methods to obtain the identification results of stakeholders, the author compares the results of the two methods. The author believes that the difference is that the Mitchell scoring method gives the ranking of different stakeholders, but does not know the reason behind the ranking, while the qualitative analysis just gives the reason. The two complement each other and can draw a more comprehensive conclusion. In the follow-up analysis, the author reintroduced non-governmental organizations, which were excluded by the Mitchell scoring method, into the key stakeholders.

文章最后作者总结了利益相关者识别中的一些共性，得出了四点主要的结论，分别为利益相关者识别具有相似性、利益相关者识别受企业所处的行业影响较大、跨国企业对利益相关者的关注度更高，及利益相关者不是一成不变的。

At the end of the paper, the author summarizes some commonalities in stakeholder identification, and draws four main conclusions: stakeholder identification is similar, stakeholder identification is greatly influenced by the industry in which the enterprise is located, multinational enterprises pay more attention to stakeholders, and stakeholders are not immutable.